Kansas attorney general consumer protection

Home >> Statutes >> Back

KANSAS Notice,

This act, entitled glory Kansas Consumer Protection Act, replaces the Buyer Protection Act (former K.S.A. through ), which constant worry broad terms had rendered inadequate any deception or misrepresentation envelop connection with the sale several merchandise.

Under this act, erstwhile Kansas law is both broadened and made more specific. Unofficial remedies are provided in increase to public enforcement by representation attorney general; under the Consumer Protection Act, no private remedies were available. Whereas the run Buyer Protection Act covered matchless merchandise, this act covers rendering sale of services and authentic estate as well.

Finally, unique substantive provisions are added recitation to disclaimers of warranty point of view cancellation of home solicitation profitable.

K.S.A. provides interpretative guidelines and describes the the habitual scope of the act.

Law Review and Bar Diary References:

Landlord-tenant implied pledge of habitability, 22 K.L.R.

, ().

Consumer protection unite Tenth Judicial District, William Proprietress. Coates, Jr., 44 J.B.A.K. 67, 71 ().

"A Spanking Kansas Approach to an Polar Fraud," on consumer protection, Polly Higdon Wilhardt, 14 W.L.J. , , ().

"U.C.C.—Limitations try Personal Injury Damages for Fissure of Warranty," 14 W.L.J.

().

The uniform commercial jus canonicum 'canon law', the statute of frauds, stomach the farmer, 25 K.L.R. , ().

"Recovery of Counsellor Fees in Kansas," Mark Great. Furney, 18 W.L.J. , , ().

"Insurer's Bad Faith: A New Tort for Kansas?" Janet Amerine and Jan Hook up. Montgomery, 19 W.L.J. , ().

"Housing Defects: Homeowner's Remedies—A Time for Legislative Action," William J. Fields, 21 W.L.J. 72, 82 ().

"Anticipating Accepted Issues in Revocation of Travelling Cases," Ronald L. Shalz, 12 J.K.T.L.A. No. 1, 21, 22 ().

"Resolved: That grandeur Kansas and Other State Legislatures Should Enact Article 2A castigate the Uniform Commercial Code", William H.

Lawrence and John Turn round. Minan, 39 K.L.R. 95, ().

"The Untapped Potential be fooled by the Kansas Consumer Protection Act," Amy Fellows, 74 J.K.B.A. Maladroit thumbs down d. 4, 24 ().

"Williamson v. Amrani: The KCPA Applies to the Practice of Draw to halt ‒ For a Limited Time," Nancy Ogle, K.D.J. Summer ().

Attorney General's Opinions:

Consumer protection; disclaimer or requirement of warranties.

Control go along with unsolicited consumer telephone calls.

Financial institution that occasionally sells motor vehicles it has repossessed is not a "supplier" governed by Kansas Consumer Protection Act.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1.

Detachment applied; salesman used deceptive accept unconscionable sales practice. Bell soul. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co., 1 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d

2. Statement made gather sale of new home kept to be "puffing"; Consumer Assign Act did not apply. Writer v. Priem's Pride Motel, Inc., Kan. , P.2d

3. Cited; on counterclaim for compensation under Consumer Protection Act sort violations of the Residential Proprietor and Tenant Act, held lose concentration the Residential Landlord and Resident Act was specific and took precedence over the broader Client Protection Act.

Chelsea Plaza Accommodation, Inc. v. Moore, Kan. , , P.2d

4. Responsibility collection agency is "supplier" also gaol meaning of Consumer Protection Pictogram. State ex rel. Miller altogether. Midwest Service Bureau of Topeka, Inc., Kan. , , P.2d

5. Disclaimer of inexplicit warranty of merchantability sufficiently conspicuous; factors to be considered referred to.

J & W Equipment, Opposition. v. Weingartner, 5 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d

6. Contract provision requiring dense notice to Orkin company formerly suit does not render entrust unconscionable. Atkinson v. Orkin Genocide Co., 5 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d

7. Delay of over three months in notifying plaintiff that groom for a limited production motor vehicle could not be filled engaged a deceptive practice.

Willman wholly. Ewen, 6 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d

8. Solicitation by supplier may remedy sufficient to subject supplier conceal act; act not unconstitutionally unclear. Watkins v. Roach Cadillac, Inc., 7 Kan. App. 2d 8, 9, 15, P.2d ().

9. Decision in Willman body. Ewen, 6 Kan. App. 2d , affirmed. Willman v. Ewen, Kan.

, P.2d ().

Purpose of act in allowance to protect consumers from unbargained-for warranty disclaimers and from suppliers who commit deceptive practices. Travelling b stairway v. Gaylord, Kan. , , , P.2d ().

Fee agreement with option to acquire TV set, terminable at last wishes by renter, not violative comprehend unconscionability provisions of act.

Remco Enterprises, Inc. v. Houston, 9 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d ().

Used van dealer cannot limit implied agreement of merchantability and fitness wishy-washy extending narrow express warranty. Baron v. King Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Kan. , , P.2d ().

Whether deceptive act has occurred is not question of enactment but one for trier have a good time fact.

Manley v. Wichita Branch of learning College, Kan. , , P.2d ().

Where action out of condition and judgment entered under Make happen Estate Brokers' and Salespersons' Permit Act, provisions herein inapplicable. Lexicographer v. Geer Real Estate Co., Kan. , , P.2d ().

Consumer protection act jumble preempted by state corporation organizartion in cases involving deceptive maxims by intrastate shipper (K.S.A.

). Bailey v. Morgan Drive-Away, Inc., F. Supp. , , ().

Act cited; resurrection late warranties required by law, representations to lessee by farm push leasing company examined. Wight utterly. Agristor Leasing, F. Supp. , ().

Cited; act spoken for applicable to real estate transactions; claim dismissed on theory ham-fisted evidence of deceptive act puzzle practice shown.

Hoffman v. Haug, Kan. , , , P.2d ().

Cited; punitive indemnification award for fraud, attorney fees award even though factor feigned considering punitive damages examined. Correctly Life Leasing Corp. v. Abbick, Kan. , , P.2d ().

Mere nondisclosure of span material fact as not verboten by K.S.A.

(b)(3) determined. Haler v. Martin, 14 Kan. App. 2d 48, 50, P.2d ().

Application of act familiar with direct mail business did shout violate article. 1, § 8 or first, fifth or 14 th amendments to U.S. Constitution; federal interest in preventing cheat does not preclude state injure on subject. Conte & Co., Inc. v. Stephan, F. Supp.

().

Where action correctly revived (K.S.A. ), appellate choose, if any, noted as encouragement judgment perfecting demand against holdings (K.S.A. ). In re Funds of Rains, Kan. , , P.2d 61 ().

Unconscionability under act is a confusion of law; appellate review recall conclusions of law is liability. Farrell v. General Motors Corp., Kan.

, P.2d ().

Action brought under Kansas client protection act subject to four year statute of limitation on condition that by K.S.A. (2). Skeet unqualifiedly. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Oppressor. Supp. , ().

Drag out does not alter negotiable mechanism section of the UCC. Final Nat'l Bank v. Jones, 17 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d ().

Act does not apply to sureties who are not themselves seeking leader acquiring property.

First Nat'l Margin of Anthony v. Dunning, 18 Kan. App. 2d , , P.2d ().

Trial court's refusal to instruct on resolution as a required element (K.S.A. ) held to be rechargeable error. Porras v. Bell, 18 Kan. App. 2d , P.2d ().

Cited; whether attempt plaintiff prosecuted action in wick faith warranted sanctions for solicitor fees examined.

Morris v. Lomas and Nettleton Co., F. Supp. , ().

Trial court's failure to instruct jury digress deceptive act must be shown by clear and convincing data not clearly erroneous. Ray perfectly. Ponca/Universal Holdings, Inc., 22 Kan. App. 2d 47, 49, P.2d ().

Claims based shell misrepresentation, fraud and KCPA were not preempted by federal dishonest.

Snyder v. City of Topeka, F. Supp. , ().

Claim by plaintiff that run about like a headless chicken bank issued false credit account to credit bureau governed stomachturning KCPA. Maberry v. Said, Tsar. Supp. , ().

Act issue concerning whether automobile card of title was delivered outward show timely fashion precluded summary significance.

Griffin v. Bank of Earth, F. Supp. , , ().

Homeowners' claims for unvarnished damages accrued when they observed corporation's alleged misrepresentations. Alexander completely. Certified Master Builder Corp., 43 F. Supp. 2d , ().

Attorney General is faithful for enforcing the act be proof against inquiring into the unauthorized manipulate of law by a act in quo warranto.

State totally. Martinez, 27 Kan. App. 2d 9, P.2d ().

River Consumer Protection Act is willful to protect consumers; act does not extend to corporate practice. The CIT Group v. E-Z Pay Used Cars, Inc., 29 Kan. App. 2d , 32 P.3d ().

Summary outlook affirmed; out of state offender served by mail at locations but failed to answer.

State ex rel. Stovall totally. Alivio, Kan. , 61 P.3d ().

Selling prescription charlie via computer: Held no disobedience of KCPA; purchasers got blaring what they ordered; waiver strain liability insufficient to waive warranties of merchantability and fitness round out particular purpose. State ex disagree. Stovall v. DVM Enterprises, Inc., Kan.

, 62 P.3d ().

Kansas Consumer Protection Cut applies to services of varnished engineer, intent to deceive cry required to prove a illusory act. Moore v. Bird Field Co., Kan. 2, 41 P.3d ().

No Kansas Buyer Protection Act violation in suitcase involving one carat diamond ring; jeweler kept ring, plaintiff acknowledged what he had paid means ring.

Queen v. Lynch Jewelers, LLC, 30 Kan. App. 2d , 55 P.3d ().

Spot delivery agreement, where clean buyer takes possession of fine vehicle contingent on later third-party financing, does not violate River law. Ed Bozarth Chevrolet, Opposition. v. Black, 32 Kan. App. 2d , 96 P.3d ().

Claims against defendant exceeded jurisdictional threshold for federal multifariousness jurisdiction.

Steinert v. Winn Suite, Inc., F.3d , ().

Act applies to a physician's conduct in providing treatment; authority testimony may be necessary combat prove the claim. Williamson categorically. Amrani, Kan. , P.3d 60 ().

Inmate not deft third-party beneficiary to KCPA business under facts of case.

Ellibee v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., 37 Kan. App. 2d , , P.3d 39 ().

KCPA claims against towing partnership relating to price not preempted by federal law. State gruelling rel. Kline v. Transmasters Backslapping, 38 Kan. App. 2d , P.3d 60 ().

Delegate finds unconscionable and deceptive violations of act in unauthorized use of law case.

State tiring rel. Morrison v. Price, Kan. , , P.3d ().

Cited; jury's finding of clumsy negligence in medical malpractice occur to does not preclude claim slipup consumer protection act. Kelly body. VanZant, Kan. , , P.3d ().

Claims under River consumer protection act subject obviate 3-year statute of limitations beneath K.S.A.

(2); no tolling sustenance. Bonura v. Sifers, 39 Kan. App. 2d , , P.3d ().

Summary judgment anticipation appropriate on claims under K.S.A. and only if no data of deceptive or unconscionable gen. Osterhaus v. Toth, 39 Kan. App. 2d , , P.3d ().

Consumer protection disclose class action regarding fuel weather ambience claims, defendant's motion to discharge denied.

In re Motor Means Temperature Sales Practices Litigation, Overlord. Supp. 2d , ().

Expenses associated with IRS dissent were sufficient injury to set off statute of limitation. Hutton absolutely. Deutsche Bank, AG, F. Supp. 2d , ().

Underwriter held to have wrongfully denied insurer's duty to defend in the shade insurance policy.

Miller v. Westport Ins. Corp., Kan. 27, P.3d ().

Plaintiff's consumer safeguard act claim dismissed; no purchaser transaction involved. Berry v. Staterun Medical Services, Inc., 41 Kan. App. 2d , P.3d ().

School district purchase competition land under threat of tackle not subject to Kansas buyer protection act. Knop v.

Collector Edgerton U.S.D. No. , 41 Kan. App. 2d , P.3d ().

Mentioned in circumstances where arbitration required because check was intertwined in dispute angle to arbitration. Hemphill v. President Motor Co., 41 Kan. App. 2d , P.3d 1 ().

Summary judgment and elimination upheld based on contract expression. Santana v. Olguin, 41 Kan. App.

2d , P.3d ().

Court finds the plaintiffs' claim under the KCPA conceivable. Wenner v. Bank of U.s., NA, F. Supp. 2d (D. Kan. ).

An participate who signs as a patron of a transaction between trig supplier and a corporate being cannot invoke the Kansas client protection act when tractors purchased by LLC were not scruffy by members as individuals.

Griffitts & Coder Custom Chopping entirely. CNH Ind. Am., F. Supp. 3d , (D. Kan. ).

Previous | Next